The term 185.63.253.2pp looks like a standard IPv4 address at first glance, but it is not valid. Why? Because IPv4 addresses strictly follow a format of four numerical segments (octets) ranging from 0–255, separated by dots. The addition of the “pp” suffix violates this structure, making it unrecognizable by networking systems, browsers, or DNS servers.
This mislabeling often occurs due to user typos, automated system errors, or malformed scripts. Understanding the difference between an invalid format like 185.63.253.2pp and the legitimate 185.63.253.2 is crucial in cybersecurity, network management, and digital troubleshooting.
185.63.253.2: The Valid IP Address
When the “pp” is removed, we’re left with 185.63.253.2, which is a valid IPv4 address. This IP belongs to the 185.63.253.0/24 subnet.
Ownership and Hosting Provider
-
Registered to: HOSTPALACE Datacenters Ltd
-
ASN: AS60064
-
Company: HOSTPALACE CLOUD
-
Location: Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
This IP is part of a larger pool typically used by hosting companies, cloud providers, or dedicated server clients. The server sits within a cluster of addresses reserved for enterprise hosting, signaling that it may support websites, applications, or private servers.
Why 185.63.253.2pp is Invalid
There are several reasons why 185.63.253.2pp is not recognized as a legitimate IP:
-
Improper Syntax: IPv4 cannot contain letters or additional characters.
-
No Resolution: DNS lookups fail when the format is incorrect.
-
Routing Errors: Network devices reject malformed IPs.
-
Misinterpretation: Security systems may flag it as suspicious activity.
In other words, 185.63.253.2pp is a formatting mistake, not a usable digital address.
Technical Standards of IPv4
IPv4 addresses must follow these rules:
-
Four Octets Only – e.g., 185.63.253.2
-
Range 0–255 – each segment must fall within this range.
-
No Extra Characters – suffixes like “pp” are invalid.
-
Optional CIDR Notation – addresses may include
/24or similar for subnetting.
By contrast, 185.63.253.2pp fails rule 3, making it invalid.
Common Causes of the ‘pp’ Error
The suffix “pp” may appear in logs, scripts, or user inputs due to:
-
Copy-paste mistakes during system configuration.
-
Encoding errors in automated tools.
-
Annotation by users attempting shorthand labeling.
-
System bugs where IPs are modified during processing.
In each case, the presence of “pp” prevents systems from recognizing the intended IP.
185.63.253.2 in Cybersecurity Context
Valid IPs like 185.63.253.2 can play important roles in cybersecurity. They may appear in:
-
Firewall logs
-
Traffic reports
-
Hosting traces
-
Blacklist/whitelist records
If you encounter 185.63.253.2pp in logs, always correct it to 185.63.253.2 before further investigation. Misinterpreting malformed IPs can cause you to miss real threats or misclassify safe connections.
Geolocation Insights
Looking up 185.63.253.2 reveals that it is located in Amsterdam, Netherlands, within a hosting provider’s infrastructure.
Geolocation matters because:
-
Security analysts use it to trace malicious actors.
-
Businesses use it for compliance with regional laws.
-
Users rely on it for understanding service origins.
Security Risks of Malformed IPs Like 185.63.253.2pp
Although invalid, entries like 185.63.253.2pp may still appear in attack logs. Hackers sometimes use deliberately malformed IPs to:
-
Bypass weak validation filters
-
Confuse automated systems
-
Exploit logging vulnerabilities
Thus, monitoring and validating IP inputs is critical to network health.
How to Handle 185.63.253.2pp in Practice
If you encounter 185.63.253.2pp, follow these steps:
-
Correct It – Remove the “pp” suffix.
-
Validate It – Check if 185.63.253.2 responds to ping or tracert.
-
Trace It – Use tools like WHOIS, IPinfo, or IP Geolocation.
-
Log It Safely – Avoid storing malformed IPs in critical logs.
-
Monitor Activity – Ensure the IP is not tied to malicious behavior.
Broader Lessons About IP Management
The case of 185.63.253.2pp highlights larger principles:
-
Always validate inputs in applications and scripts.
-
Educate staff to avoid typos when logging IPs.
-
Automate filtering of invalid formats.
-
Recognize hosting provider IPs when analyzing traffic.
Future of IP Validation
As IPv6 adoption grows, issues like 185.63.253.2pp may become less common, but malformed addresses will remain a risk. Newer systems must:
-
Support automated IP correction
-
Distinguish between typos and attacks
-
Maintain cross-version validation for IPv4 and IPv6
Conclusion
The mystery of 185.63.253.2pp boils down to a simple fact: it’s not a real IP address. The trailing “pp” makes it invalid. However, the correct form—185.63.253.2—is a real and valid IPv4 address tied to a hosting provider in Amsterdam.
This example underscores the importance of IP validation, accuracy in logs, and awareness in cybersecurity practices. Whether you’re a network engineer, IT manager, or security analyst, understanding the difference between malformed and valid IPs can help protect systems, streamline troubleshooting, and ensure clarity in digital operations.
